Beyond modernisation? Social care and the transformation of welfare governance
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article reflects on the process and outcomes of modernisation in adult social care in England and Wales, drawing particularly on the recently completed Modernising Adult Social Care (MASC) research programme commissioned by the Department of Health. We begin by exploring the contested status of ‘modernisation’ as a descriptor of reform. We then outline some of the distinctive features of adult social care services and suggest that these features introduce dynamics likely to shape both the experiences and outcomes of policy ambitions for modernisation. We then reflect on the evidence emerging from the MASC studies and develop a model for illuminating some of the dynamics of welfare governance. Finally, we highlight the emerging focus on individualisation and on user-directed and controlled services. We argue that the current focus of modernisation involves a reduced emphasis on structural and institutional approaches to change and an increased emphasis on changes in the behaviours and roles of adult social care service users. This focus has implications for both the future dynamics of welfare governance and for conceptions of citizenship. Introduction Social care services are becoming the subject of reform as welfare states across Europe face increasing pressures on existing provision and anticipate growth in future demand. Many countries are actively engaged in spatial reorganisations of care, developing integrated models of service provision, reviewing and adapting insurance-based schemes, or experimenting with models of ‘cash for care’. Those involved in reform within continental Europe look across the Channel to the UK experience, regarding it as a model to follow, a warning of what might be to come, or some uneasy mix of the two. This article focuses on the experience of reform in England and Wales, teasing out lessons from a recently completed programme of research commissioned by the Department of Health.1 We begin by setting out the context of the reform programme (badged, like other UK
منابع مشابه
Designing a Model for Public Welfare Governance in Iran
Background: One important goal of policymakers regarding economy in developed countries is to improve quality, standard and level of well-being in society. The purpose of this study was to provide a model that leads to improving the quality of public welfare in the country's governance system. Methods: This was a combined (qualitative-quantitative) research conducted in 2020. To collect data i...
متن کاملDifferentiation and Reintegration: Interpreting Local Government Reforms in the Age of Governance
How to get a suitable theoretical framework for making comparisons between changes in the structures of local government and governance? Since political actors love to talk about “modernising” local government and political scientist talk about local government reforms as attempts of “modernisation”, one way of approaching the question could be to ask what “modernisation” means. Political actor...
متن کاملAdult Economic Model and Values Survey
The present study investigated the extent to which the economic beliefs of participants from eight nations (Austria, France, Greece, Israel, New Zealand, Singapore, Slovenia, and Turkey) co-varied with national differences in economic development and modernisation. We predicted and found that greater human capital is associated with more economic self-efficacy and economic satisfaction; less ci...
متن کاملGovernance Must Dive Into Organizations to Make a Real Difference; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”
In their 2016 article, Saltman and Duran provide a thoughtful examination of the governance challenges involved in different care delivery models adopted in primary care and hospitals in two European countries. This commentary examines the limited potential of structural changes to achieve real reform and considers that, unless governance arrangements actually succeed in penetrating organizatio...
متن کاملPublic Participation: More than a Method?; Comment on “Harnessing the Potential to Quantify Public Preferences for Healthcare Priorities through Citizens’ Juries”
While it is important to support the development of methods for public participation, we argue that this should not be at the expense of a broader consideration of the role of public participation. We suggest that a rights based approach provides a framework for developing more meaningful approaches that move beyond public participation as synonymous with consultation to value the contribution ...
متن کامل